Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1816

reference
964-tree-1
name
1816
tree-preservation-order

undefined

964-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032194 50.858873)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032080 50.858861,-1.032085 50.858884,-1.032101 50.858904,-1.032126 50.858920,-1.032157 50.858931,-1.032192 50.858934,-1.032228 50.858931,-1.032259 50.858921,-1.032285 50.858905,-1.032301 50.858886,-1.032307 50.858863,-1.032302 50.858841,-1.032287 50.858821,-1.032262 50.858805,-1.032230 50.858794,-1.032195 50.858790,-1.032160 50.858794,-1.032128 50.858804,-1.032103 50.858819,-1.032086 50.858839,-1.032080 50.858861)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL